Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 11:43AM ET - U.S. Markets close in 4 hours and 17 minutes.

"In Every Way a Good Thing": The Upside of Soaring Federal Budget Deficits

Posted May 21, 2009 01:42pm EDT by Aaron Task in Newsmakers, Recession
With the federal budget deficits expected to exceed $1.8 trillion this fiscal year and borrowing expected to top $9.3 trillion over the next decade, it's no wonder many policymakers, politicians, economists and everyday Americans fear the worst.

But rising federal budget deficits are "in every way a good thing," according to University of Texas professor James Galbraith.

Higher budget deficits are a natural result of declining tax revenues and rising unemployment and serve as a "great stabilizer" to the consumer and the economy as a whole, he argues -- as you'd expect from the son of famed Keynesian economist John Kenneth Galbraith.

The government's bailout of the banks was an "unproductive use of Federal borrowing," but Galbraith is otherwise fully supportive of the administration's borrow-and-spend efforts so far.

Furthermore, he believes those calling for the government to reverse course soon are being "terribly imprudent," noting it took more than 20 years for the private sector to fully recover after the 1929 crash.

Click "more" to embed the video.

139 Comments

Dimitre
Dimitre - Thursday May 21, 2009 01:48PM EDT

While bonds yeilds are rising and the dollar is weakening, because of massive stimulus packages, the largest US banks are having one of the best earning seasons ever. This is due to the crook government officials and their distructive policies.What people should do is take their money out of big financial institutions and deposited in small and regional banks. I want to see BAC, C, and WFC to be nationalized and cleaned up not to be artificialy supported with taxpayers money.

Mike
Mike - Thursday May 21, 2009 01:49PM EDT

Talk about a great stabilizer, the UK gets downgraded and the pound still continues to appreciate against the dollar. Its in free-fall and its CYA time.

sportsmadness
sportsmadness - Thursday May 21, 2009 01:52PM EDT

The speaking skills of this guy is horrid. He cant even explain his points very well. Commercial mortgages and the ARM resets are going to pound the market way down. THATS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW RIGHT NOW!!! Anything else is just a rumor or knee jerk reaction from a day trader.

shags1_23
shags1_23 - Thursday May 21, 2009 01:53PM EDT

Please set your phone to silent before the movie begins. And before a presidential press conference. And before delivering an interview.

hot4bearmen
hot4bearmen - Thursday May 21, 2009 01:55PM EDT

Its high-time techticker gets more Austrian-view economists and kick these Keynesians to the curb.

B
B - Thursday May 21, 2009 01:56PM EDT

Keynesian economists are insane. One day, the world is going to realize that the US doesn't have enough money or even productive capacity to repay their loans. That will be the day they stop lending to us (i.e. buying our Treasuries). But I guess in the world of Keynesian economics, spending a bunch of money you don't have is "in every way a good thing".

LanceS
LanceS - Thursday May 21, 2009 01:57PM EDT

If it were possible for a country to print its way to prosperity, Zimbabwe would be rich rather than a basket case. The US is headed for the same fate. Sell that Buick and buy a rickshaw.

JenniferG
JenniferG - Thursday May 21, 2009 01:59PM EDT

Yes, recovery took 20+ years thanks to FDR's misguided Keynesian policies. Galbraith betrays his elitism when he says anyone who doesn't agree with me, simply doesn't understand the underlying economic policies. Given that I'm not regurgitating the policies of my pothead ancestors that impeded the growth of our nation, I'd say I and many others understand a lot more about economic principles than the likes of you. Reread some Austrians.

kerry b
kerry b - Thursday May 21, 2009 02:02PM EDT

With a name like Galbraith, our most well-known economic ignoramus (Galbraith never got anything right - he still believes that the New Deal made sinse), what else would one ever suspect? Giant deficits mean giant interest payments for the foreseeable future. And higher deficits mean more borrowing which mean, guess what? That's right, higher interest rates. And if that isn't bad enough, higher deficits are used topay for, guess what? That's right. Higher energy prices, making our sickly industrial base in even worse shape. The Chinese are building 1 nucelar plant per year, for around $2 billion per gigawatt. We're spending eight times that amount to build mostly useless wind power. Guess why Buffet is investing in the Chinese economy?

Reinaldo
Reinaldo - Thursday May 21, 2009 02:02PM EDT

Not To Worry just keep printing more $$$ To Pay Budget Deficit eventually the Markets will be a roller Coaster Ride that never goes Up Only Down

dano
dano - Thursday May 21, 2009 02:02PM EDT

This guy has to defend Keynes, his father. I disagree with the Keynesian view and agree with the Austrian School of Economics. I'll argue with this guy anytime. If a large budget deficit is so great, why not print an infinite amount of money and drop it out of helicopters? That should be even better for the economy! Not! He forgets that there will be a breaking point where people will give up on the currency as it will become worthless as all fiat currencies have become worthless when you look at history. The world's fiat currencies will not be an exception.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday May 21, 2009 02:03PM EDT

This article is further proof that Keynesian economics is garbage. We are in trouble because we have spent too much. We are broke. And now Galbraith thinks spending more money that we don't have is good!?! And what is the government spending our money on? Pork. More junk pet projects, more American empire, more welfare. All government spending is a waste.

Paul L
Paul L - Thursday May 21, 2009 02:04PM EDT

This guy is a MORON! Debt has consequences, has he noticed, millions of homeowners are losing their homes because their debt is unsupportable. The banks should have been nationalized, but injecting capital into them is almost the same thing effectively. Does this idiot know there's a financial/debt crisis going on? Transfer payments, spreading the wealth around, is just blatant socialism which has never worked anywhere.

SLDKFJs
SLDKFJs - Thursday May 21, 2009 02:07PM EDT

What a hack. Does he not realize that every dollar borrowed by the government not borrowed by the private sector? That every dollar the government borrows pushes up interest rates? That the only way to "counter" that effect is to devalue the dollar by printing more, which leads to higher prices which is also a tax? That printing more represents a property tax? If it is in every way a good thing, why stop where were at? Why don't we just do a trillion a day? Why do we bother going to work?? What a hack.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday May 21, 2009 02:08PM EDT

tzoon002 you got it baby...after they take our money now hitting us with undue penalties, GIVE YOUR MONEY TO THE LITTLE BANKS IN YOUR COMMUNITIES.

Dave
Dave - Thursday May 21, 2009 02:08PM EDT

We recovered 20 years after the '29 crash because every other major industrial producer on the planet was bombed back in time by a generation! Unless he thinks that WWIII is going to happen soon (and we're somehow going to come out of it unscathed) that's a pretty bad justification to 'spend spend spend' for the next 20 years.

Dave
Dave - Thursday May 21, 2009 02:09PM EDT

We recovered 20 years after the '29 crash because every other major industrial producer on the planet was bombed back in time by a generation. Unless he thinks that WW III is going to happen soon (and we're somehow going to come out of it unscathed) that's a pretty bad justification to 'spend spend spend' for the next 20 years.

- Thursday May 21, 2009 02:09PM EDT

No wonder we are scratching our heads and not knowing what the next move should be. There are people out there like James Galbraith spouting off these unbelieveable unsupported theories. Some of these notions about building massive debt to solve our financial problems is down right crazy and disjointed. What we need it to put these folks, who out of personal greed violated the public trust, in jail and seize all of there assests and turn over to the treasury.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Thursday May 21, 2009 02:10PM EDT

Sounds good unless you are the one who gets to pay off the debt.

hunterta
hunterta - Thursday May 21, 2009 02:12PM EDT

Beavis and Butthead should be in a good mood today - finally getting that down day they have been talking about for 3 months

Yahoo! reserves the right to refuse, or remove any comment that does not comply with the Yahoo! Terms of Service. The submission of spam, hateful, or obscene messages may result in the termination of your Yahoo! ID.
About Tech Ticker - Send FeedbackDisclaimer. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Help
Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. Delay times are 15 mins for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges.

Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.